![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg1DFDeWEkxdFz0P8bBegs1K8mw4RFp9S-W8ysqTHa77X7-w-T09017Rhs2g8jP0NRQJ-O6UtFlS6kHCqAT1d__HKNKe9qOnjOPDpOmKspFccLiFf19Y0dWE4WUkBfqvBFwdoSXU8Ss_Szz/s1600/Newsweek-cover-crop.jpg)
When
talking about Pop Design one has to keep in mind what caused it and what were
the main factors that influenced and affected it. The term was coined in the
50’s referred to popular culture. The Independent Group was founded in London
in 1952 whose members were Richard Hamilton, Eduardo Paolozzi, Reyner Banham
and Peter and Alison Smithson. It was the era of rebellion for the people born
during the Post-World War II generation. They wanted to destroy the traditional
boundaries between fine art and design.
It
initially started in England as was the Industrial Revolution. It was a
reaction against abstract expressionism that was happening in America such as
the splattering works of art of Jackson Pollock. Before the emergence of Pop
Design in the 1960’s, Functionalism and good design were popular in Germany
whilst Italy was producing Bel (beautiful) Design. There were developments in
artificial materials such as polypropylene which gave designers the possibility
to experiment with design as well as colours.
Joe Colombo 4860 Chair in 1964
It
was a revolutionary idea to make a chair from a single piece of material and
the fact that the same chair could be adjusted to three various heights. These
models were also stackable and since they were completely produced by a machine
a new way of mass production had started.
Giancarlo Piretti, Plia in 1969
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjRbjct55rUinYfXcAU_LTsSs-oJ6coJy1N-C0qpyTvEKQ67AAW9ksXUrxBLu4nrA9oU9H3sF31TM56-jU1WktyXKZHfVY9T5GVTpGdysXD3HblsENgucm0rs7gF8G3P8WhKMaiyFY_1O08/s1600/Plia_Piretti_Kopie_01_7b74675d1c.jpg)
This
design was novel due to the fact that it had a new element to the chair. It was
now foldable. While at the same time chairs were being stacked on each other,
now they were being folded and actually diminishing the surface area that they
occupied. This chair was light and flexible. It was also an elegant chair which
could be used both for the indoors as well as the outdoors. Due to its simple
and straightforward construction, this chair could be produced at low cost.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgqyTiIdeVxlBuRSChsvvmIf_JGhkzeDd_usmA4GT8Qxncdzc8GP0YQN_kUOEWTIEGyxn38RwIPoeUEItgR53Ovjah-0Hv18OpkfVhaRhhkrTPe4VDcAdr4PtVjJW8i-8WdKdSr7pXrshfc/s1600/verner-panton-chair.jpg)
Once
that all these new materials were being discover it prompted for pop culture
and Anti-Design to rebel against traditional norms and behaviour. They wanted
to protest against the established design by making use of artificial
materials. They also mocked previous styles by joining them together where in
fact they clearly to dot blend together… which is the whole point about it all.
One of such examples is the work of designer Alessandro Mendini in his Poltrona di Proust in which he got a
Baroque chair design and decided to cover it with a pattern which is very
similar to Pointillism.
Showing
the similarity between Alessandro Mendini’s Poltrona
di Proust Chair and Georges Seurat’s Detail from Circus Sideshow (1889).
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiBN1hKJLCxZYJin8Nztl7nogVqxdmrWQdE4P1NcpL45B1FPrpIdSag2skLWlnClHj1hY1NVnmDY20opPga3YryVriKdSbD0q-3FH2SyO8uWk1pBOtGcI0QcIV3YlYU9lupHA9ieTaw3-WZ/s1600/blow-chair.jpg)
The
functionality and rationality of Modern design was being questioned in the 60s
and 70s. Designers were starting to question their own work – what was the role
of the designer in society? If the artists could be “playful” and experimental
in their creations, why couldn’t designers also be that way? Artificial
materials were being invented at this stage which designers thought were
playful enough to be used in their creations. Such creation examples are:
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEizK6ihuPQTXXtb6Q05OnT8j9HiLGaA6ZyJoHSgUGzQy45i_1lqMAR4C2bNkwwAT6g6jsQtt928cz0BkoKh1doKdPVwfXTHwB6PY88uhYFH6TnsF8UvFVyYiGYlpaMgRc-AYczGGRgrMmOo/s1600/Sacco_Gatti_01_c55da968ab.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhUQAGMnK2AnlVSW4JUMBV760MCC5RZv5XMZMYXyaVQHwNcXEA5YG-J_lV7oTnUn4da7NQwgDGrRJKesZEq_yhkrzIkLIN4jlO7HTtTFg5L1pM_u7Vo2pktWEWYliYjv5FCMMDw7aeHuGS6/s1600/anti-vietnam-posterfullsize.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjLfpWBHozD8AIiUvyutYyHmxQSZuKXPaYLGRepFEoCIsI-YeJHtRWdOluJHd8SlApC7YzoX846XJ-V2u9Aoa6lJH8kDRTbbGLMA9C0sE7pXrlc62hXg4W1f6I4SvC4ZnbH8_dHwm3yGC8d/s1600/rocky4.jpg)
Pop
design was the antithesis of the Modern movement’s motto of “Less is more” which they changed it to “Less is a bore”. It eventually led to
Radical Design in the 1970’s.
Designboom. 2000. Joe
Colombo - chair ‘universale’, 1965/67 [online] Available at: http://www.designboom.com/history/joecolombo_chair.html
[Accessed on 30th November 2013]
Poltrona di Proust. Since 1978. Vitra Design Museum - Alessandro
Mendini. [online] Available at: http://www.design-museum.de/en/collection/100-masterpieces/detailseiten/poltrona-di-proust-alessandro-mendini.html
[Accessed on 30th November 2013]
Georges Seurat. Detail from Circus Sideshow. 1889.
Wikipedia. [online] Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Seurat [Accessed on 30th November 2013]
PVC Blow Chair.
1967. Zanotta - Jonathan de Pas, Donato d’Urbino , Paolo Lomazzi and Massimo
Scolari [online] Available at: http://brimstonesandtreacle.wordpress.com/2012/03/08/you-are-a-nomad/
[Accessed on 30th November 2013]
Sacco. 1968. Zanotta - Piero Gatti, Cesare Paolini, Franco
Teadoro. [online] Available at: http://www.design-museum.de/en/collection/100-masterpieces/detailseiten/sacco-gatti-paolini-teodoro.html [Accessed on 30th November 2013]
Rod. 1966. Creative Roots - Anti-Vietnam War Poster [online] Available at: http://creativeroots.org/2009/04/anti-vietnam-war-poster-1966/
[Accessed on 30th November 2013]
No comments:
Post a Comment